| De Beers fined $10M for price fixing |
| Diamond
producer agrees to plead guilty, pay fine and gets right to compete directly
in U.S. market. |
COLUMBUS, Ohio De Beers pleaded guilty on Tuesday in federal court to a
decade-old price-fixing charge, freeing the world's dominant diamond producer
to compete directly in the lucrative U.S. market.
De Beers, the South African diamond concern that is 45 percent owned
by mining conglomerate Anglo American PLC, was fined the maximum $10 million
by U.S. District Court Judge George Smith under the terms of the plea
agreement.
The charge of fixing prices on industrial diamonds in 1991 and 1992
had previously been dismissed against De Beers' original co-defendant in the
1994 case, General
Electric Co for lack
of evidence, while De Beers refused to acknowledge U.S. jurisdiction.
But the company's stance left representatives of the 124-year-old De
Beers, a dominant force in the global $55 billion diamond industry, subject
to arrest if they set foot in the United States, the world's biggest diamond
market.
It also forced De Beers, which had sales of $5.5 billion and profits
of $676 million in the year ended in February, to use intermediaries to sell
in the United States, where more than half the world's diamonds are
purchased.
The guilty plea by a holding company, De Beers Centenary AG of
Switzerland, was expected and appeared to end 60 years of anti-trust
entanglements with the U.S. Justice Department.
"Our desire is to be fully, legally compliant wherever we operate
in the world," said De Beers spokeswoman Linda Dorrington in Toronto.
"We just want a clean slate."
Judge Smith said there was no reason to assess additional fines
because De Beers paid $26 million a few years ago to settle civil suits
related to the case.
Smith also declined to put the company on probation, saying, "the
court does not want the mantle of responsibility to oversee the worldwide
operations of De Beers."
Revamped
strategy
De Beers, which controls roughly half the global rough diamond market,
has revamped its strategy in recent years and sought to remake its
monopolistic image, said Martin Rapaport, publisher of the Diamond Report
newsletter in New York.
The company, which went public in 2001, has sold off much of its $5
billion inventory of rough diamonds and has won approval from the European
Commission for its policy of being the diamond "supplier of choice"
for a select group of distributors.
The company's goal, Rapaport said, has been achieved: more advertising
paid for by compliant distributors has boosted demand for diamonds, helping
to lift the prices of rough diamonds.
Prices for rough diamonds dug from mines around the world have risen
by 15 percent so far this year, Rapaport said. The company has said diamond
shortages have caused prices to rise.
While De Beers no longer dictates diamond prices by buying up
lower-priced supplies around the world, the company is striving to boost
demand through advertising and control supply by limiting the number of
middlemen it deals with in the often insular industry, Rapaport said.
The planned opening of De Beers' first U.S. retail store on New York's
Fifth Avenue in a joint venture with French luxury goods company LVMH -- Moet
Hennessy Louis Vuitton -- lent added impetus to resolving the anti-trust
case.
The planned rollout of U.S. retail outlets -- another is planned in
Los Angeles -- was expected to spark a high-end retail battle and still more
diamond advertising by rival Tiffany and
Co. Inc. as well as Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels
|